We could always allow for ... smaller sub-group side projects, if getting all five of us to agree on a project is too impossible (a virtual certainty when the question of emotional content comes up while Raven and I are on the same team.) Raven doesn't want to do the second part of Undertale and I have no intention of making him, but we don't need to just cancel the project outright because it's no longer unanimous, do we? Conversely, everyone else seemed to think the Professor Layton series would work except for me, but why should I stand in the way of the others having their fun (if I'm wrong)? Budgie once proposed 12 to the Moon and I was all for it while the others shot it down for being too sad ... can't Budgie and I just go do it? And you and I still need to play through a co-op NES or SNES game at some point ... :)

I'm with Budgie in worrying that we are never going to find another project that all five of us really want to do at the exact same time. We keep saying to just wait for that special magical amazing thing to come along ... well, that's what Undertale was, for me. I'm sorry to anyone for whom that didn't work out, but I'm glad we got to do it (including hopefully concluding it with the good ending next time? Hopefully?) If we don't chain everyone to this idea of a unanimous all-or-nothing approach, then we can do a lot more of the projects individual members are particularly excited about. No more disappointment if your idea gets shot down, no more awkwardness if your idea gets adopted and we do it but the others don't appear to be having fun.

Think Team Hatoful under the Freebird Rule (appropriately enough.)

Edit: The current barrier to this idea, of course, is that, well, you're the only one who knows how to and is set up to record things ... but we can figure something out if we have to, that's not insurmountable.