http://crassadon.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] crassadon.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] davidn 2013-09-22 03:08 pm (UTC)

If anthropomorphic should mean to give something a human-like form, then wouldn't humans be non-anthropomorphic, because, being fully human, there's nothing to make "like" a human, as everything already is? The concept of something being similar to a human, means anything completely human is excluded.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting