Entry tags:
Stumbling through Super Metroid - Part 9
Here's another fifteen-minute episode, in which this time a whole lot more happens! The exploration continues, I end up a bit stuck, then remember something I ignored earlier and get right back on to the route again, including epic battles with two bosses, one manageably small and one intimidatingly large. And grabby.
http://youtu.be/1NSei4KciRA
http://youtu.be/1NSei4KciRA
no subject
I'm glad you had so much difficulty with the boss of this area, or as I've always called it, the. . .that, thing. I've never actually come up with a name for it. .
no subject
I only know about them thanks to the legal hullaballoo there is about whether they're legal to sell in the US. (Short answer: they aren't. (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/342) Long answer: Under U.S. Code Title 21, Section 342, they're marked as an "adulterated food" due to being a confectionary with something wholly embedded in them that serves no functional or nutritional purpose.)
no subject
no subject
I love them!! Everybody at my school would love them, and we would trade the little toys around; and even some of the teachers love them, and would trade the toys, too~ They would sometimes be rare "solid" toys, and you could trade two of the standard ones for one of those. . I still sometimes buy them; I just got a future race car.
I think they are banned in the US, because the small parts may injure children--although no other country has this issue, to my knowledge. I also think there's now a "Kinder Surprise-like" item for sales in the states with much the same general structure. But who knows! I must play video games, and cannot look this up!!! D:!
no subject
"A food shall be deemed to be adulterated [and thus illegal to sell within the United States] if it is confectionary and has partially or completely imbedded therein any nonnutritive object, except that this subparagraph shall not apply in the case of any nonnutritive object if, in the judgment of the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] as provided by regulations, such object is of practical functional value to the confectionery product and would not render the product injurious or hazardous to health[.]"
So basically, unless this person (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services) says they're okay, we can't have them. (That "judgment call" caveat, by the way, is why we're allowed to have lollipops even though the handles meet this criteria of them being "adulterated" foods.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject