A Tale From Down Below
Nov. 7th, 2011 08:45 pmMy uncle in Germany is very into trains - he has a large collection of miniatures in cabinets around his house, and used to generously bore us all rigid with his slide projector at least once whenever we visited him. I've never understood how they can possibly be interesting myself, or have any comprehension of how anybody can care in places where I've seen posts like "Here's a photograph of an R1S5T on the southbound line from Brick Arch to Dog and Castle." "No, that's a R1S5T/C, I think you'll find."
But there's one part of it that I think I've suddenly understood - coming from this post, I'm absolutely fascinated by the notion that there are abandoned stations hidden somewhere underground, physically accessible but where no train ever goes and where you could never now get to (without walking down the tracks in the dead of night and risking being killed). It sounds like something from a science fiction novel - little pockets of complicated engineering hiding below the city that were once functional and used by people every day, but that have now been long abandoned and forgotten.
The presence of them is something that only really hits you if the subway has been a regular part of your life. Being familiar with the unchanging, fixed chain of stations that a train must always go through - Park Street, Charles/MGH, Kendall, Central, Harvard, Porter, Davis - it's really strange to imagine that that wasn't always the sequence. Near Harvard Station alone, there are three abandoned stations - there used to be one called Stadium that only got occasional use, but two of them were part of the main line. There used to be a Harvard-Brattle (which I imagine must have partially been absorbed by the underground bus tunnel), and most interesting of all, Harvard-Holyoake is apparently still visible down a tunnel if you're looking carefully when the train leaves the station on its current loud squeaking route. But not knowing that it was there, I never saw it - it's as if it was some sort of ghost hiding just out of view of the normal world.
But there's one part of it that I think I've suddenly understood - coming from this post, I'm absolutely fascinated by the notion that there are abandoned stations hidden somewhere underground, physically accessible but where no train ever goes and where you could never now get to (without walking down the tracks in the dead of night and risking being killed). It sounds like something from a science fiction novel - little pockets of complicated engineering hiding below the city that were once functional and used by people every day, but that have now been long abandoned and forgotten.
The presence of them is something that only really hits you if the subway has been a regular part of your life. Being familiar with the unchanging, fixed chain of stations that a train must always go through - Park Street, Charles/MGH, Kendall, Central, Harvard, Porter, Davis - it's really strange to imagine that that wasn't always the sequence. Near Harvard Station alone, there are three abandoned stations - there used to be one called Stadium that only got occasional use, but two of them were part of the main line. There used to be a Harvard-Brattle (which I imagine must have partially been absorbed by the underground bus tunnel), and most interesting of all, Harvard-Holyoake is apparently still visible down a tunnel if you're looking carefully when the train leaves the station on its current loud squeaking route. But not knowing that it was there, I never saw it - it's as if it was some sort of ghost hiding just out of view of the normal world.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:34 am (UTC)"Harvard-Holyoake is apparently still visible down a tunnel if you're looking carefully when the train leaves the station on its current loud squeaking route. But not knowing that it was there, I never saw it - it's as if it was some sort of ghost hiding just out of view of the normal world."
And that's where my hair stood up.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:47 am (UTC)The nearest I've got to... breaking those boundaries was a cave known to my group of friends in university - if you climbed over the rocks next to the tower of the castle (when I described this previously, someone made a comment to the effect of "I didn't know you went to university in Lord of the Rings") and walked along a sort of rock shelf at low tide, there was a spacious cave under the cliff. As the tide came in, however, the only way up was by climbing up to the pool with the seals in it in the nearby aquarium and then getting over a gate into their grounds, so that you didn't have to sidle along the fence on the cliff's edge like so many Princes of Persia. But when you're a student, you can sort of get away with that sort of thing more.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 06:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 07:58 am (UTC)Apparently they have 3 carriage and 6 carriage trains, with carriage numbers 3,4,2 and 1,7,6,5,4,2. I had always thought that they had been like license plates. Also 4 foot 8 and a half is the international standard gait of the tracks. There was also a 7 foot gait and when they brought them in in ireland, they ended up using a 5 foot 3 gait. This means that it is highly unlike to be a tunnel on the existing railway from UK to Ireland. Also that when they were building the first railway line in Australia, they used british and irish engineers. One set started in Perth and the other in Melbourne. When they met in Adelaide (or the middle) then they hit a problem as one had used the 4 foot 8 and a half and the other a 5 foot 3. I have yet to confirm this but makes agood story at least.
So needless to say we talked for the whole journey.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 12:20 pm (UTC)I never thought of myself as a 'kid' then, but students do seem awfully young now that I'm a week away from being 27. How frightening.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 12:21 pm (UTC)(Although I have to admit to being curious as to why they number the carriages 3-4-2 and 1-7-6-5-4-2, instead of going in the more traditional numerical order)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:16 pm (UTC)This site (http://underground-history.co.uk/aldwych.php)'s a great source of information on the London underground's closed stations.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 02:51 pm (UTC)confused the name, it's even scarier to Google actually: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0805570/
no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-08 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-10 04:33 am (UTC)H, is for my alma mater Harvard,
C, it stands for Central, next stop on the line,
K, is for the cozy Kendall station
and C, is Charles that overlooks the brine...
P, is Park Street, busy Boston station,
and W, is Washington, you see...
Put them all together they spell:
"HCKC - PW!"
Which is just about what Boston means to me! -Tom Lehrer
I didn't know where you lived, until I saw those station names, and was reminded of this famous song..
no subject
Date: 2011-11-10 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-12 01:15 pm (UTC)