Struggling through Prince of Persia
Oct. 25th, 2011 08:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
davidnThis one's been a while in the making, largely because my plan for it turned out to be a little ambitious. For this video, I was determined to complete the NES version of Prince of Persia, as it's been one of my favourite games ever since I first played it in the mid-90s - on the DOS version, I can breeze through it in under twenty minutes.
Unfortunately, I was only to discover the NES version's comparative dreadfulness through playing it - it casts off the cut-scenes, responsiveness of the controls, and many key parts of the game, making me think that it must have been made by people who were a bit pressed for time. But I persisted - and the resulting experience makes it one of the parts of this experiment that, rather opposite from the jealousy of console-owning friends I had at that age, made me very glad that I grew up with the PC instead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zaxWD0BVSs
This is a fairly huge video, and it's been edited down from its original running time of upwards of one hour - I imagine that it's only interesting to watch the whole way through if you're familiar with the PC version of the game and can appreciate the differences as I get caught out by them. You get about seven minutes of unbroken gameplay, and then I start being a bit more liberal with my time-altering superpowers. It features:
Good luck. If you decide to stick with it through the whole 45 minutes, you'll need it.
Unfortunately, I was only to discover the NES version's comparative dreadfulness through playing it - it casts off the cut-scenes, responsiveness of the controls, and many key parts of the game, making me think that it must have been made by people who were a bit pressed for time. But I persisted - and the resulting experience makes it one of the parts of this experiment that, rather opposite from the jealousy of console-owning friends I had at that age, made me very glad that I grew up with the PC instead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zaxWD0BVSs
This is a fairly huge video, and it's been edited down from its original running time of upwards of one hour - I imagine that it's only interesting to watch the whole way through if you're familiar with the PC version of the game and can appreciate the differences as I get caught out by them. You get about seven minutes of unbroken gameplay, and then I start being a bit more liberal with my time-altering superpowers. It features:
- Twelve excruciating levels
- Four thousand retakes
- Three thousand and ninety-nine instances of me saying "Right!" overconfidently after a retake
- Even more bizarre exasperated noises (coming soon as a Best Of collection)
- Nearly melting the bleep machine
- The same eight bars of music repeated for all eternity (cut out during editing in this video - you're welcome)
- Skeletons where they shouldn't be
- Lack of other objects where there should be
Good luck. If you decide to stick with it through the whole 45 minutes, you'll need it.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-10-28 01:47 am (UTC)I've been wondering myself whether the guy making that Metroid one had a special plugin, or was just painstakingly patient - but come on, Prince Of Persia couldn't be any simpler, it doesn't scroll! :) All you'd have to do is move your gameplay footage to cover a different part of the map every time the game changes screens... (Hell, the more I think about it; you could even do it in Flash, and save an awful lot of bandwidth in the process...!)
Anyway, it looks like the same guy has actually already thrown together an example of one level from the game, so you can get a taste of what it would be like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqhNhs9jD8A
"yes, it hasn't been an impassable pit until then - you've only seen it if you didn't cling on in time at the very start of the level."
Oh, shoot -- but, I guess that's what would happen to most people upon playing that level for the first time? (I didn't realise it was the same room, hence my desire to see it played Atlas-style ;) ) That would make me rescind my statement about the drop not being foreshadowed, at least...
"The PC version involved a rather long pause at that door before rescue comes, potentially leading you to believe that you've done something wrong. The SNES version did it well - instead of just one door, Jafar appears and catches you between two of them, but a few seconds after he leaves the mouse turns up to open the way forward for you."
At least the SNES version has a fancy mini "cutscene" of sorts, to indicate that this is a major point in the level - to me at least, it would feel very different than just thinking "oh fuck, the door closed because I took too long". (Though I'll admit it's a more pleasant compromise than just having the mouse show up instantly... although it would also make me wonder why Jafar doesn't finish the job right then and there!)
"there really is something charming about the amount of detail that went into just twelve levels of environment in this one."
That's the old problem with video games as value propositions - Portal arguably had a similar approach, but the only way they could justify selling that to people was by giving you two other games with it.... downloadable games are starting to alleviate this slightly, but even then it seems like far too often, the length of a game is being held up as the element that all other budgetary concerns have to bend to suit.. ah well.
"the Mega CD one frankly looks like it should have been voiced by Strong Bad."
You wouldn't have a hard time convincing someone that it WAS! That YAHHHH (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6k9u7YuiqI#t=0m53s) is completely..... indescribable. :) (And an especially odd choice since they had a much... er.... slightly more suitable one right after it!)
Also, wait, what? How did the graphics get a DOWNGRADE from cartridge (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkxcBHl62nk) to CD (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqLXxXfrtYE)?
Somewhat relatedly, I just stumbled onto the fact that this game was originally written for the APPLE ][ ! I had no idea! When I first saw youtube videos of an Apple ][ version, I just thought, "oh, how embarassing, they'll port it to ANYTHING; there's no chance of a later game like this running REMOTELY well on that kind of hardware..." Man, seriously, my respect for what they accomplished has just about doubled upon learning how EARLY they pulled all of this off! Unthinkable!
... did I just say "they"? Because really, it was all one guy, wasn't it. Jordan Mechner. That's even more staggering. I guess you can count his brother too -- given what a fan you are, I assume this isn't news, but I might as well ask because it would be horribly remiss of me not to share this with you if you haven't seen it - are you familiar with the original footage (http://vimeo.com/1854745) that he traced the animations from? Truly uncanny when you see the exact frames jump out at you from a human being...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-30 11:52 pm (UTC)And yes - a recent spate of Prince of Persia activity over the last few weeks (which was only partly directly caused by me) inspired me to download and try the original Apple II version. It does have some issues with slowing down when more than a couple of objects are on the screen, but the controls are otherwise perfect and responsive, despite the game's relative ugliness making it seem like it should feel sub-par - the shakiness on the console conversions isn't innate to the limited hardware, it's just that the original one was made by somebody who actually cared about what he was doing!
I've seen some of the original footage before - it's so difficult to remember, now, that it's not just a matter of him slapping up a video from his digital camera on to Youtube, and that this was all recorded on VHS with a camcorder the size of a suitcase. I love that the new independent downloadable market has reintroduced the idea of the lone bedroom coders, but thinking back to the time before people had the tools that we do now... it's very impressive, what they accomplished.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-31 02:49 am (UTC)What's wrong with just moving a video frame around a map? Sure, it's not perfect, but it's never going to look perfect anyway just because you never really see him cross the screen threshhold... it's the principle! But, if you really want it to 'save state'- why not just cut the video into the various screens (which would probably make your job easier anyway) and then leave the previous video in place when it finishes running :)
the shakiness on the console conversions isn't innate to the limited hardware, it's just that the original one was made by somebody who actually cared about what he was doing!
Amen!!