Fighting Fantasy VIi
Jul. 16th, 2012 08:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

This was one of the more famous Fighting Fantasy books, having been turned into a moderately rubbish PC game some years ago. It's set in a town that houses a twisted labyrinth underneath its foundations - not a natural phenomenon explored for curiosity and fortune like in Etrian Odyssey, but a custom-built monster-filled dungeon constructed by a sadistic Dungeons and Dragons-playing baron that really let his obsession get out of hand. Each year, champions come forward to brave its depths despite the count of survivors remaining at zero since its inception, and here you are cast as one of the people stupid enough to attempt it yourself.
As soon as I started reading the first paragraphs on the iPhone, I was surprised by how straight the conversion was from book to game - it's actually almost like something you'd expect from a Kindle in that while you get full-colour illustrations, the text and mechanics are basically unchanged from the paper version. The numbering and text of entries remains the same - choices are presented as hyperlinks that are disabled and highlighted according to whether they're valid or not, rather than the game making any effort to force the narrative even when a choice depends on something that it already knows (like whether you have an item in your inventory). For example, rather than splitting entries when a dice roll needs to be made, the classic challenges of "Test your luck. If you are lucky, turn to 94. If not, turn to 172." are still present - you first have to click the link after "Test your luck" which brings you to the dice-rolling screen, and then one or the other of those links will become enabled depending on the result of the roll.
Fights play out in exactly the same way as they used to, as well - you're taken to the screen where shaking the device causes a couple of dice to tumble around, and you can tilt it around to try to influence their landing even though this naturally doesn't help at all. The most you get in terms of extras is a decidedly Statbuilder-like little fanfare and "YOU WON" when fights end. They could have done a lot in transplanting this to a handheld game, taking you to an RPG-type battle screen to fight enemies or at least give visual representations of the monsters, but instead it's obvious that they made a conscious decision to keep it very firmly in its tangible roots.

The game - and the general Fighting Fantasy philosophy - says that no matter how poor your initial dice rolls are in setting up your character, the true route through the game should allow you to pass fairly easily. This is blatantly untrue - in fact, there's no reason not to just keep trying the character creation until you end up with the maximum possible skill score of 12 (a crucial statistic in fights). And even with that advantage, the setup of this particular book is such that you really need to do everything perfectly to have a chance of completing it - if you don't have three specific gems near the end, then instead of getting the promised reward, you get roped into a lifetime of maintaining and setting up traps for the dungeon, then presumably hiding away and hoping to see some passing gamebook designers fall into them.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 02:32 am (UTC)Also, that thing from the book version cover would be cute if it only had two eyes, but the eyes are a little unnerving as it currently stands.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 11:35 pm (UTC)Island of the Lizard King on the other hand
Anyway. I think that, as much as I never thought I'd be saying this, Roberta Williams' games seem positively generous compared to this book if you follow it to the letter of starting again every time you die (I have since found out that you can actually step back in this version, but it's difficult to find the feature and you only have a limited undo buffer). It definitely shares the love of instant deaths, with absolutely no way to know which choice is right and which is wrong - fairly early on, you're confronted with a large statue and given the option to climb up and retrieve one of its eyes. Pulling out the left eye activates two undead flying guardians that you have to fight in turn (with a penalty for being in an awkward position). Having died to those, I restarted and pulled out the right eye instead, whereupon it sprayed poisonous gas into my face and killed me instantly.
And because you need a very specific three gems at the end of the book, chances are always high that you're already on an unwinnable path and don't know it - and there's no way to find out until the very end after you've overcome every other obstacle ahead.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 12:50 am (UTC)And the funny thing (which just happens to be on my mind since I'm currently replaying it thanks to GOG) is that Roberta Williams' game design actually is generous if you play King's Quest 7--unfathomable, considering the game that came a mere two entries in the series before it, yet true. I just beat chapter one, as part of my "I beat this game before but it's been so long that I only remember about half the puzzles" replay, and was completely unaware that you actually have options in chapter one. That's not something I forgot; it's something I didn't even realize.
The game tricks you with what looks like a classic KQ5 "choose carefully because it's gone forever" exchange in which helping a certain wanderer gets him to lead you to a place with a horn lying on the ground and an inaccessible bag which he makes accessible for you. Inside is a certain magical powder (much like the Ghost-B-Gone/No Ghost spray from Uninvited, I can't even say the full name of the item without revealing the painfully obvious puzzle it solves) and a rope. As soon as you take one, the entire rest of the bag disappears forever. (Also, this is unconfirmed since I chose the powder, but I think I read somewhere that taking the rope makes the horn disappear too?) Hope you chose wisely!
Except that you're actually all right either way. There are two major puzzles left at this point, and one requires the horn or the rope, and the other requires the powder or a certain combination of other inventory items you probably already had before even doing this. Thus, either choice leaves you with the ability to solve both puzzles ... actually, you can even complete the chapter without helping the wanderer at all and without getting anything from him at all, though it's a little non-intuitive. (You need to just take it upon yourself to go to that area without him leading you there, take the horn since only the bag is guarded, and use the horn and your other items.)
Now, if this were King's Quest 5, the dual solutions for both puzzles would still work, but would consume the items, and you'd have to just know in advance which ones you need to use now and which ones you'll need to save for the unwinnable situation coming up four chapters later, but ... it's not.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 01:07 am (UTC)I should probably mention that his 'crown' - I'm not even joking here - was revealed to be a parasitic spider that's attached itself to his brainKing's Quest 7 (and the counterpart I played by Al Lowe, Torin's Passage) definitely came at a softer time in Sierra's life... instant revival on death (which is exactly how death in adventure games should be) and a distinct lack of unwinnable routes. I'm really very impressed to hear about the choice of items and puzzles that they were used for - I remember being fascinated at the first of these games I ever played (the remake of King's Quest I) and how the puzzles seemed to have many different solutions that gave you points according to their cleverness. Keeping the idea of multiple routes like that without making so many of those routes "dead" would have still been a great way to set their adventures apart from Lucasarts, rather than going for distinction through brutality.
I remember only two specific things from King's Quest 7 - that wanderer in the desert who wants fresh water (and who throws the cauldron away if you give him salt water, but notably doesn't kill you for it), and seeing just how much Sierra wanted to be Disney at that point in their life. (Except Sierra still kills protagonists a lot, and Walt disnae).
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 01:53 am (UTC)himthat book immediately.King's Quest 7 is ... very notably Disney-inspired (or, if you've seen the "Land Beyond Dreams" number recently, it's Disney-"inspired" in much the same way that Gamma Ray songs are Judas Priest-/Iron Maiden-/Helloween-inspired) but for a game that finally got tired of Graham and Alexander and chose to feature Valanice and Rosella as the playable characters this time around, it actually works remarkably well. It has quite a lot of charm to it. And the soundtrack is great, too.
And there may be one or two poisonous monsters, but there is a notable lack of owls to warn you about them.And yes, it is rather strange that the wanderer doesn't kill you for giving him salt water, especially since he directly threatens your life (well, "go, now, this thirst drives me mad, and I know not what it will make me do" is pretty direct for a Sierra game, anyway) right before you have the chance to do that, and even KQ7 has no qualms killing you over less serious offenses. (With the instant "oops, let me try that again" feature, but you know.)
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 07:46 am (UTC)Funnily enough, when I first started reading this post, my initial concern was the same one you voiced later on: cheating. I maintain, as with all games one plays solo, that this should always be an option if one chooses to use it. Even a choice at the start which asks, "should valid choices be enforced?" that stops you cheating if you tell it to or lets you get on with it otherwise would have been sufficient on that front.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 11:43 pm (UTC)This book really is sadistic, as you'd expect from an unsurvivable dungeon - though it would be nice in the context of the game if the choices presented could be reasoned through with more than arbitrary guesswork! That, and it likes putting you in corners and not telling you until you've gone much further down a doomed path. To give another example in addition to the statue, above - there's a point where you're being pursued by an army of evil little elves. You have a choice - you can run over a bridge or dive into the water next to it. If you run over the bridge, you come to an unopenable door (you need a key much earlier in the game) and are shot by a thousand arrows. If you dive into the water and have a hollow pipe, you can hide and breathe through it while they look for you, then re-emerge when they're gone. Then you walk over the bridge, find the door, have to try to barge it down and are shot by a thousand arrows.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-17 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 03:29 pm (UTC)Also of interest might be this site here, which I found a few months ago; it's a fan site, but features a number of home-made FF-style gamebooks, playable online, of varying levels of difficulty. Enjoy!
http://www.ffproject.com/
D.F.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-18 11:01 pm (UTC)I think Space Assassin was my favourite - it's certainly the one I remember the most, having been the first one I read. In fact I had a go at recreating it in Megazeux but never got very far into exploring all the paths and recreating them in a live-action game... I have no idea of all their relative difficulty because when I read them I was just picking any choice I liked and not keeping track of inventory, but playing Deathtrap Dungeon with enforced rules really made me realize how hard it is to choose the one true path through the game without venturing into the useless sections...
I'm definitely impressed with that site! There seem to be active fan communities producing new material for a lot of nostalgic things, now, and I was just thinking how difficult these things were to write and playtest - persumably they had to lay it all out in branches first and then use a computer to organize it all into randomly chosen section numbers...
no subject
Date: 2012-07-19 09:11 am (UTC)I'm trying to remember the name of the other space-themed one I used to read at the school library: it had some angry tentacled creature flying a hoverbike on the front of it; it had a theme of the bad guy using cloning to create an army of wolf-man (or dog-man, I don't remember any more) soldiers and needing table salt to stop them from taking over, and it had some bit at the start that I didn't really understand about having to choose whether to travel through light or time to reach your destination. Any thoughts?
D.F.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-21 03:05 am (UTC)