![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's been a long, long time since I just showed a game off - but I want to give some attention to a ZDoom game that's been criminally overlooked!
This is an amazing conversion of The Crystal Maze into first-person form by Stephen Clark, "The Ultimate DooMer". It's incredible to see the set transformed into Doom geometry, and there are 32 games of varying scope and complexity - some of which seem to also have taken inspiration from Knightmare. This is my chance to prove that I can do better than the protozoa we watched being led around by Richard O'Brien weekly.
If you want to try it yourself, get:
- A copy of Doom II from GoG or Steam or something
- GZDoom from here: http://zdoom.org
- The mod from here: https://www.doomworld.com/idgames/levels/doom2/Ports/a-c/cr-maze
Then look up a guide on how to set it up, I'm not explaining everything!
no subject
Date: 2017-07-31 04:01 am (UTC)I'm pretty tempted to try this now (probably picking as many you didn't go through as possible to minimize accidental cheating) and see whether I can do any better! My schedule's jammed though. Also I don't think any of us have played Doom… >..<
32 games—does that mean it's larger than the maze of the show? We haven't watched that either, but we've picked up bits and pieces from the Internet.
(Videography comment: I think the title is stronger without the extra ZZT zoom sequence; the zoom feels disorienting and the explanation feels unnecessary.)
no subject
Date: 2017-07-31 06:07 pm (UTC)I can't believe you've never played Doom! Even if you want to go through without monsters, I think it's the kind of thing that you'd appreciate immensely on a technical level - I can get lost in the wiki for days, reading about the workarounds that they came up with to simulate a full 3D world on the computers of 1993.
no subject
Date: 2017-07-31 10:06 pm (UTC)Also, you'd think there'd be a ZZT version of this, wouldn't you? Or do the traditional-world-style puzzles in that sort of count as close enough that it'd be redundant?
no subject
Date: 2017-08-03 06:34 pm (UTC)